10 Best Time Tracking Software for Consultants in 2026 [Tested]

Hourly consulting depends on accurate time capture, followed by a clean handoff from timesheet to invoice – and that’s why time tracking software for consultants is a must. Fixed-fee and retainer work puts budget control front and center: is the engagement staying on track, and how much time is the client actually consuming? Larger consulting firms have a staffing question to answer as well: who has room for the next project?

The way consulting work moves from recorded time into delivery decisions shaped this comparison. TimeCamp leads the list because it connects automatic time capture with client billing and project profitability without requiring a full PSA setup. Productive and Scoro work well for firms that need end-to-end project delivery and resource planning. Timely is geared toward teams that want captured activity turned into draft timesheets for review.

Best time tracking tools for consultants in 2026 (covering different needs of consulting teams) TimeCamp: Best for automatic billable-hour capture and project profitability Scoro: Best for quote-to-cash consulting management Productive: Best for project profitability and resource planning Kantata: Best for enterprise PSA and resource management BigTime: Best for complex billing and rate management Ruddr: Best for modern PSA workflows for growing services teams TimeLog: Best for European contract-to-invoice workflows Avaza: Best for project-to-invoice workflows for small consultancies Everhour: Best for time tracking inside project management tools Timely: Best for AI-drafted timesheets

 

How do we review software in TimeCamp? A human is behind every word posted here. We value our users’ time and trust, so you can be sure our team (Ola, Wojtek, Kasia, Iza, Robert, and others) spent real hours testing the apps, and then researching, briefing, and writing this article. Our editorial team has 10+ years of experience writing SaaS content, including testing and using a variety of tools daily. Our writers are also app users, so we write our recommendations based on what we would read as potential clients. Our main rule is “do not cover without a source.”We also revisit and update our articles to cover notable changes to the app’s features or pricing (at least quarterly). Read more → How do we create content and review software in TimeCamp? Happy reading!

 

Whether in-office or at client's

And from independent consultants to large professional services firms, TimeCamp makes sure every billable work hour lands into timesheets.

Get started now

How do these time tracking tools for consultants compare?

Ratings were checked in September 2026. Prices are current vendor list rates in USD unless noted otherwise, with annual billing marked where it applies.

TimeLog publishes Starter at €14 per user/month, so the dollar figure is an approximate conversion. Integration depth varies too: export, connector, and direct sync can lead to different accounting workflows.

What to look for in time tracking software for consultants in 2026

Choose based on where tracked time needs to go next: into billing, approvals, budget control, or staffing. Dedicated time tracking software should fit that process and keep manual entry to a minimum.

• Client and project structure. Consulting firms working across multiple clients and multiple projects need a clean way to separate engagements, budgets, and billing rules. Check how the software handles clients, projects, tasks, and subprojects before moving a large portfolio into it.

• Billable time and rate rules. Hourly work may use different rates by person, role, or client. Fixed-fee and retainer work also needs accurate cost and time data behind the scenes. Time tracking and billing should reflect how the firm actually charges for its work.

• Budgets and profitability. Budget tracking should show how much time or money has already been used and help managers monitor project costs before margin starts to slip. Detailed reports should connect tracked hours with revenue and project profitability.

• Invoicing and accounting handoff. Approved time should move directly into invoicing tools or accounting software. Check what the QuickBooks Online or Xero integration actually sends between systems. Time tracking and invoicing should reduce billing work and support accurate invoicing.

• Project management and calendar integrations. Connections with popular project management tools such as Asana, Jira, and ClickUp can attach task context to time records. Calendar integrations reduce another piece of manual reconstruction. Rocketlane’s 2026 consultant guide says calendar integration can bring time entry down to under five minutes, although I’d treat that as a vendor benchmark rather than an industry-wide result. Check whether each integration imports events, syncs tasks, embeds a timer, or relies on a third-party connector.

• Approvals and audit trail. Clear timesheet approval workflows help managers catch incorrect projects, rates, or billable classifications before finance uses the data. Change history also helps when an entry needs to be checked later.

• Automatic capture, cross-platform access, and offline work. Automated time tracking can create activity records or suggested entries for review, cutting down manual entry. Cross-platform functionality is especially important for consultants moving between offices, home, and client sites. Desktop, web, and mobile access keep the same process available across locations. Offline time tracking covers the gaps when connectivity is unreliable.

• Resource planning and capacity. Basic time tracking explains what has already happened. Resource planning shows future workload and available capacity across projects or teams, which helps managers decide where new work can go.

From my perspective, full PSA platforms are excessive when the main problem is missed billable time. And when it comes to time tracking software for consultants, timer also reaches its limits when managers need a forward view of staffing or a clearer picture of project margins.

Keep in mind: The software should match the operational problem you actually have.

How did we evaluate these tools?

We used the same consulting-focused criteria across all 10 products. We looked at how each tool:

• organizes time by client and engagement,
• handles billable and non-billable work,
• supports invoicing and approvals,
• connects with accounting and project management software,
• and helps with resource planning.

Reporting was assessed through the metrics consulting firms actually use to follow project performance, including profitability, utilization, and realization.

Pricing was checked directly on each vendor’s website against the plans available in 2026. G2 and Capterra ratings were reviewed separately because their scores and review counts change over time. We also used current positive and negative customer reviews to see where the documented product experience matched day-to-day use. Hands-on testing covered all the tools mentioned below. 

TimeCamp: best for automatic billable-hour capture and project profitability

Why TimeCamp works for consultants

Client calls, research, emails, and document work are easy to leave out when they sit between larger tasks. TimeCamp approaches this with two separate, yet complementary tools:

• The desktop app uses project keywords found in window titles, apps, and URLs to assign activity automatically.
• AI Time Tracker suggests entries that users can review before adding them to the timesheet.

A few minutes spent on project setup can improve the results. Client and project names give automatic tracking better context, making the recorded time easier to use for billing and project analysis.

Key features for consultants

• Automatic tracking and AI suggestions. Keyword-based capture works through the desktop app. AI Time Tracker prepares suggested entries for review.
• Billable time and project budgets. Premium adds billable time, estimates, budgets, and alerts at 80% and 100% of the assigned budget.
• Rates and approvals. Ultimate adds billing rates, labor costs, fixed-fee projects, expenses, and timesheet approval workflows.
• Invoicing and accounting. Starter includes invoicing. Premium adds invoice export to QuickBooks Online and Xero.
• Resource planning and data control. Premium includes Resource Planner. Enterprise adds self-hosted and private-cloud deployment options for firms with stricter data requirements.

Pricing

TimeCamp pricing starts with a free plan for unlimited users and projects. Automatic tracking and AI Time Tracker are included.

Starter costs $3.99 per user/month billed annually and adds invoicing. Premium costs $6.99 and opens billable time, budgets, estimates, QuickBooks Online/Xero invoice export, and Resource Planner. Ultimate is $9.99 and adds rates, expenses, fixed-fee projects, labor costs, and approvals. Enterprise uses custom pricing. Paid plans include a 14-day trial.

What customers are saying

Independent ratings checked in September 2026: 4.7/5 on G2 and 4.7/5 on Capterra.

TimeCamp turns time tracking into useful business data.	The pricing could be a bit more competitive, especially for larger teams.
Paweł P., Chief Revenue Officer at Contentation, G2, August 27, 2026. His review highlights the connection between client time and profitability.	Michał R., Founder at a mid-market company, G2, August 20, 2026. That concern can add up quickly for larger consultancies if Ultimate features are needed across many seats.

Why is TimeCamp on this list for consultants?

TimeCamp fills the space between basic time tracking and a full PSA. Firms get automatic capture, billing controls, and project profitability in the same system, but they don’t have to move the entire delivery operation into an enterprise PSA.

TimeCamp Pros & Cons

Pros	Cons
Keyword tracking plus AI-generated suggestions	Automatic assignment works better after careful project setup
Free plan with unlimited users and projects	Billable time and budgets require Premium
Invoicing, rates, approvals, and Resource Planner available as firms grow	Full PSA functions such as advanced revenue recognition aren’t included
QuickBooks Online/Xero export and self-hosted deployment options	Ultimate pricing adds up across larger teams

 

Best for: consultants and firms that want to track billable hours automatically and connect tracked time with billing and project profitability.

Not ideal if: your firm needs enterprise resource forecasting, advanced revenue recognition, or a full professional services delivery platform.

See how top teams track profitability

Book a short, focused call to see TimeCamp configured for your organization’s structure, approval flows, and reporting needs.

Why schedule a demo?

• 

  Get a guided product walkthrough
  and a tailored offer

• 

  Get your questions answered 

  in real-time

• 

  Check how we sync with your
  current tech stack

Book the Session

Joined by 18,000+ teams worldwide

Scoro: best for quote-to-cash consulting management

 

Why Scoro works for consultants

Scoro can carry a client from quote through project delivery to billing in one system. Logged time feeds invoices and project financials, with resource planning available for teams managing capacity and utilization.

Scoro is aimed at firms trying to replace several connected tools. Teams that mainly need dependable time tracking will probably take on more software than they need.

Key features for consultants

• Quotes and project budgets. Scoro builds estimates with planned costs and margins before work starts.
• Time and resource planning. Billable time connects with labor costs, bookings, availability, and utilization reports.
• Billing and financial reporting. Scoro supports recurring and scheduled invoices, prepayments, credit notes, and margin reporting.
• Accounting and project integrations. Current options include QuickBooks Online, Xero, Sage Intacct, Jira, and Google Calendar.

Pricing

Scoro uses a modular model built from eight core apps. Time-billing starts at $17 per user/month, Quote to Cash and Projects & Resources cost $29, and End-to-end costs $57. Every combination requires at least five users.

Scoro lists these as monthly per-user rates. Annual billing comes with a 13–17% discount, depending on the combination and currency. A fully featured 14-day trial is available without a credit card.

What customers are saying

Independent ratings: G2 4.5/5, Capterra 4.5/5.

Time logged by your team members directly populates active project invoices.	We had many issues regarding time tracking and getting help from support.
Khalil B., Principal Architect, G2, July 28, 2026.  That link between recorded work and billing is one of Scoro’s strongest consulting use cases.	Katie M., Senior Project Management, Capterra, February 2, 2026. Scoro covers much more than a dedicated tracker, so implementation and support deserve a close look during a trial.

Why is Scoro on this list for consultants?

Scoro combines quoting, project delivery, resource planning, and billing closely enough to cover much of the client lifecycle inside one platform.

Scoro Pros & Cons

Pros	Cons
Quote-to-cash workflow in one platform	Five-user minimum
Resource planning and utilization reporting	More setup than a focused tracker
Strong billing and project financial reporting	Small firms may not need the full workflow depth
QuickBooks Online, Xero, Sage Intacct, and Jira integrations	Adding more apps raises the price

 

Best for: consulting firms that want quotes, delivery, time, and billing connected in one system.

Not ideal if: your team mainly needs reliable time tracking and straightforward client invoicing.

Productive: best for consulting profitability and resource planning

Why Productive works for consultants

Productive connects logged time with project budgets, internal costs, and profitability. Managers can see how delivery is affecting margin before the project closes.

Resource Planner adds a forward view. Bookings show upcoming workload and available capacity, and they can also feed suggested time entries.

Key features for consultants

• Budgets and profitability. Logged billable time, cost rates, and scheduled work feed budget and profitability views.
• Resource planning. Bookings show assignments, availability, and future capacity across the team.
• AI time tracking. Productive can autofill timesheets using calendar events and previous time entries.
• Billing and approvals. Professional adds billable-time approvals, rate cards, recurring budgets, and accounting integrations.
• QuickBooks Online and Xero. Invoices and expenses can be copied to either system, with payment status synced back to Productive.

Pricing

Essential costs $9 per user/month billed yearly and includes budgeting, resource planning, time tracking, reporting, expenses, and AI time tracking.

Professional costs $24 per user/month billed yearly and adds accounting integrations, advanced reports, billable-time approvals, recurring budgets, and rate cards. Ultimate uses custom pricing. A 14-day free trial is available without a credit card.

What customers are saying

Independent ratings: G2 4.6/5, Capterra 4.6/5.

Simple and effective. Easy to use.	It takes time for teams to fully onboard and get set up.
Rui S., Senior Consultant, Capterra, April 28, 2026. He also praised the low learning curve and time-entry nudges.	Amy S., Project Manager, Capterra, March 30, 2026. That trade-off is worth factoring into the rollout. Productive covers project finance and resourcing well beyond basic time tracking, so teams need to configure more than a timer.

Why is Productive on this list for consultants?

Productive ties project delivery to capacity and margin. The same bookings and time records can feed staffing decisions and profitability analysis.

Productive Pros & Cons

Pros	Cons
Strong budget and profitability tracking	More setup than a basic tracker
Built-in resource planning	Accounting integrations require Professional
AI-assisted time entry on Essential	Solo consultants may not need the wider platform
QuickBooks Online and Xero workflows	Advanced financial controls sit on higher plans

 

Best for: growing consulting firms that need profitability and resource planning alongside time tracking.

Not ideal if: basic time tracking and client invoicing already cover the workflow.

Kantata: best for enterprise consulting PSA and resource management

Why Kantata works for consultants

Kantata, formerly Mavenlink + Kimble, is built for professional services firms that need to plan people and projects at scale. Its resource management layer combines capacity, skills, allocations, and future demand, giving managers a clearer view when several engagements compete for the same consultants.

Project financials and time data sit in the same PSA environment, so staffing decisions can be checked against delivery and margin.

Key features for consultants

• Resource planning and forecasting. Kantata tracks availability, capacity, skills, allocations, and upcoming demand.
• Time, expenses, and governance. Kantata is designed for enterprise time governance and compliance, connecting time and expense data with billing, approval rules, audit controls, and project financials.
• Integrations. Current connectors include Salesforce, NetSuite, Jira, QuickBooks Online and Desktop, Xero, and Sage Intacct.
• Reporting. Dashboards and data exports support utilization, project performance, and resource analysis.

Pricing

Kantata doesn’t publish a standard per-user price. The vendor builds quotes around company size, goals, and planned use of the platform.

Direct price comparison is difficult before talking to sales. G2 also lists Kantata as custom-priced and shows no free trial.

What customers are saying

Independent ratings: G2 4.2/5, Capterra 4.2/5.

Real-time visibility on utilization, project margins, staffing capacity, and burn rates.	It felt overwhelming and the value wasn’t immediately clear.
Elon E., Consultant in Financial Services, Capterra, April 30, 2026. His experience lines up closely with Kantata’s resource and financial-management focus.	Claire B., Founder, Capterra, January 2, 2026. Kantata’s PSA depth is easier to justify in larger organizations. Small teams may find the setup disproportionate to the problems they are trying to solve.

Why is Kantata on this list for consultants?

Kantata belongs here for firms that need resource forecasting tied closely to project delivery and financial data across a larger portfolio.

Kantata Pros & Cons

Pros	Cons
Advanced resource forecasting and capacity planning	No public list price
Strong project financial and governance controls	More complex than a focused tracker
Broad CRM, ERP, accounting, and project integrations	Small teams may not need the PSA depth
Skills and allocation data support staffing decisions	Implementation requires more planning

 

Best for: larger professional services firms managing complex resource demand and project portfolios.

Not ideal if: the main goal is reliable time tracking and straightforward client billing.

BigTime: best for larger firms with complex rates and billing

Why BigTime works for consultants

BigTime is built for firms where recording time is only the first step in billing. Rates can change by employee, role, client, or project, and finance may need several approval levels before an invoice goes out.

Project budgets and deeper billing controls sit on the higher plans, pushing BigTime closer to PSA software than a basic timer.

Key features for consultants

• Rates and billing models. BigTime supports configurable rates plus time-and-materials, fixed-fee, retainer, milestone, and mixed billing.
• Approvals and project budgets. Essentials includes approvals and rate management. Premier adds project budgeting, custom cost and rate controls, and multi-level approvals.
• Accounting integrations. BigTime supports two-way connections with QuickBooks Online, QuickBooks Desktop, Xero, and Sage Intacct.
• Reporting. Project and financial reports cover budgets, utilization, billing, and profitability.

Pricing

BigTime Essentials starts at $20 per user/month. The vendor doesn’t publish list prices for Advanced, Premier, or Enterprise.

Essentials covers time and expenses, invoicing, rate management, approvals, reporting, and QuickBooks integration. Advanced adds custom reporting and project templates. Premier brings project budgeting, multi-currency invoicing, custom cost and rate management, multi-level approvals, and Sage Intacct.

What customers are saying

Independent ratings: G2 4.5/5, Capterra 4.6/5.

Everything can be managed centrally.	Some features have a learning curve, and occasional glitches or limited customization can slow down certain tasks.
Jennifer H., Realtor Associate, Capterra, July 20, 2026. Her review points to project planning, invoicing, and scheduling as part of that appeal.	Oscar H., Office Manager, Capterra, August 19, 2026. BigTime trades simplicity for tighter billing control. Firms with straightforward rates may find the extra setup hard to justify.

Why is BigTime on this list for consultants?

BigTime earns its place through rate management and billing depth. It suits professional services firms where approvals, project budgets, and accounting requirements have moved beyond basic time tracking.

BigTime Pros & Cons

Pros	Cons
Strong rate and billing controls	Only Essentials has a public price
Multiple billing models	Deeper financial controls require higher plans
Multi-level approvals on Premier	Small firms may not need the PSA depth
QBO, QuickBooks Desktop, Xero, and Sage Intacct integrations	Setup grows with billing complexity

 

Best for: larger consulting firms with complex rates, approval workflows, and accounting requirements.

Not ideal if: your billing model is simple and basic time tracking already covers the job.

Ruddr: best for a modern PSA for growing services teams

Why Ruddr works for consultants

Ruddr combines project delivery with time, invoicing, utilization, and financial reporting in one PSA. Team covers the core operational work, including its AI Assistant, and Pro adds resource allocations, forecasting, rate cards, and deeper financial controls.

The interface is a genuine selling point here. Capterra named Ruddr Best Ease of Use in the 2026 PSA category, which matches the pattern in current user feedback.

Key features for consultants

• Time, projects, and invoicing. Team includes time and expense tracking, utilization, invoicing, reporting, and standard integrations.
• Resource planning and forecasting. Pro adds resource allocations plus plan and forecast reporting for future demand and utilization.
• Rates and approvals. Workspace and client rate cards, client approvals, and multistep approval workflows sit on Pro.
• Financial controls. Pro adds project health tracking, revenue recognition, variance reporting, and concurrent accounting integrations.
• Accounting integrations. Ruddr supports QuickBooks Online, QuickBooks Desktop, Xero, and Sage Intacct.

Pricing

Team costs $14 per billable user/month billed annually, or $17 monthly. Pro costs $24 annually, or $30 monthly. A 30-day trial is available without a credit card.

Ruddr charges for billable personnel. Non-billable users are free as long as at least half of the workspace members are billable.

What customers are saying

Independent ratings: G2 4.6/5, Capterra 4.8/5.

Setup expected to take weeks actually took just a couple of days.	Some features feel a bit limited when it comes to customization, especially in reports.
Katie P., Executive Director, G2, April 2, 2026.  She also praised the clean, intuitive interface.	Lakshmisetty K., Software Engineer, Capterra, April 8, 2026. Reporting flexibility is the area I’d test during a trial. Ease of use already scores well in current feedback.

Why is Ruddr on this list for consultants?

Ruddr gives growing firms core PSA functions at a public starting price, with resource planning and deeper financial controls available on Pro.

Ruddr Pros & Cons

Pros	Cons
Clean interface and strong ease-of-use feedback	Report customization can feel limited
Time, invoicing, and utilization included on Team	Resource allocations require Pro
Resource planning and forecasting on Pro	Advanced financial features raise setup complexity
Transparent annual and monthly pricing	Monthly plans cost noticeably more

 

Best for: growing consulting teams that want PSA capabilities with clear pricing and a user-friendly interface.

Not ideal if: highly customized reporting and dashboards are central to your workflow.

TimeLog: best for European consultancies needing contract-to-invoice PSA

Why TimeLog works for consultants

TimeLog connects tracked hours and expenses with project budgets, invoicing, and financial reporting. Consulting firms can follow how delivery affects margin and revenue from the same project data.

Its finance ecosystem is particularly strong in Europe, with integrations for systems such as e-conomic, Business Central, and Fortnox.

Key features for consultants

• Project financials. Time and expenses feed budgets, invoices, margins, and revenue reporting.
• Resource planning. Resource Planner shows workload and capacity across employees and projects.
• Billing. TimeLog supports hourly, fixed-rate, retainer, and ongoing service work across its higher plans.
• European finance integrations. Growth opens integrations and API access for regional finance and payroll systems.

Pricing

TimeLog publishes pricing in euros. Starter costs €14 per user/month (about $16), Growth €34.50 (about $40), and Professional €53 (about $61).

Starter covers time and expenses, project management, and invoicing, but excludes integrations and API access. Growth adds those connections plus billable/non-billable tracking and multi-currency invoicing. Professional adds retainers, KPI reporting, and automated invoicing. A 14-day trial is available.

What customers are saying

Independent ratings: G2 4.4/5, Capterra 4.3/5.

G2 has one TimeLog review from 2026, published on January 15 by a Verified User in Airlines/Aviation at a mid-market company.

The reviewer praised the “simple and intuitive” interface and the ability to keep time and projects in one place.

 

The same user also found more detailed reporting and integrations harder to configure, with navigation slowing down across larger project lists.

I’d test reporting setup and integration configuration early, especially if your consultancy has a more complex finance stack.

Why is TimeLog on this list for consultants?

TimeLog gives European consultancies a direct connection between project delivery and financial follow-up, with accounting integrations built around the systems many firms in the region already use.

TimeLog Pros & Cons

Pros	Cons
Strong project-finance focus	Pricing published in EUR
Resource planning and margin reporting	Starter excludes integrations and API access
Retainers and automated invoicing on Professional	Finance ecosystem is strongly Europe-oriented
Business Central, e-conomic, and Fortnox integrations	Reporting setup can take extra work

 

Best for: European consulting firms that want project time, financial tracking, and invoicing connected to regional finance systems.

Not ideal if: your finance workflow depends mainly on U.S.-specific accounting integrations

Avaza: best for small consultancies moving from projects to invoices

Why Avaza works for consultants

Avaza keeps projects, time, expenses, resource scheduling, and invoicing in one workspace. Small consultancies can take client work from task assignment through to the invoice while keeping the setup lighter than a full PSA.

There’s useful financial depth here too. Avaza supports fixed-fee work, different billable and cost rates, project budgets, utilization reports, and project profitability analysis.

Key features for consultants

• Projects and timesheets. Tasks, time entries, expenses, and billable categories stay connected to the same project.
• Rates and profitability. Billable and cost rates can vary by person, project, or work category, with profitability reports built from actual time and expenses.
• Resource scheduling. Avaza shows assignments, future workload, utilization, and scheduled revenue.
• Quotes and invoicing. Billable time, fixed amounts, and expenses can move directly onto client invoices.

Pricing

Avaza charges per account. Free includes five active projects, ten customers, and limited access to timesheets, scheduling, and invoicing.

Startup costs $11.95/month, Basic $23.95/month, and Business $47.95/month. Higher plans increase project, invoice, and user allowances. Additional Timesheet/Expense, Admin/Finance, or Scheduling users cost $7 per user/month.

What customers are saying

Independent ratings: G2 4.5/5, Capterra 4.6/5.

Timesheet entry and reporting engine are indispensable.	I’d like to see more custom reporting options within the UI.
Nick G., Project Manager, G2, April 28, 2026. He specifically pointed to staff utilization and fixed-fee managed services.	Michael B., Infrastructure Engineer, G2, April 21, 2026.  He liked Avaza’s reporting overall but needed external scripts for deeper customization.

Why is Avaza on this list for consultants?

Avaza gives small firms more than basic time tracking while keeping the product relatively compact. Rates, resource scheduling, project budgets, and profitability reports give teams room to handle more client work before a heavier PSA starts to look necessary.

Avaza Pros & Cons

Pros	Cons
Projects, time, expenses, and invoicing in one system	Free plan has tight usage limits
Supports fixed-fee work and multiple rate structures	Advanced reporting customization is limited
Resource scheduling and utilization reporting	Less depth than enterprise PSA platforms
Account-based pricing suits small teams	User allowances vary by plan and role

 

Best for: small consultancies that want project management, time tracking, scheduling, and invoicing in one compact system.

Not ideal if: your firm already needs advanced resource forecasting or enterprise-grade PSA controls.

Everhour: best for consultancies that work inside a PM tool

Why Everhour works for consultants

Everhour brings time tracking directly into tools such as Asana, Jira, ClickUp, Trello, and Monday. Consultants can record work against the tasks they already use for delivery, then add budgets and billing around the same project structure.

That approach loses much of its appeal if your team doesn’t already run client work in one of those platforms.

Read our full Everhour review →

Key features for consultants

• PM integrations. Native connections sync projects and tasks, with timers embedded through Everhour’s browser extension.
• Budgets and alerts. Projects can use time or fee budgets with configurable threshold alerts.
• Billing and invoicing. Billable hours and rates feed invoices, with export to QuickBooks Online and Xero.
• Resource planning. Schedule shows workload, assignments, availability, and team capacity.

Pricing

Everhour Free supports up to five users with limited features and includes a 14-day trial of the full product.

Team costs $8.50 per seat/month billed yearly, with a five-seat minimum. It includes native integrations, budgeting, invoicing, resource planning, SSO, and advanced permissions. Organizations with at least 50 seats can request custom pricing.

What customers are saying

Independent ratings: G2 4.7/5, Capterra 4.7/5.

I like the smooth integration via the Chrome browser extension.	They need to make a cleaner setup for exporting timesheets into excel files.
Matt S., COO, G2, March 30, 2026. His team uses it to track client work against project budgets.	Sebastian T., Junior Graphic Designer, G2, April 29, 2026. Everhour earns its place through the PM integration. I’d test exports and reporting before rolling it out across the team.

Why is Everhour on this list for consultants?

Everhour adds time, budget, and billing controls to a project management setup the team already knows.

If you want to see where that approach really differs from TimeCamp, our TimeCamp vs Everhour comparison breaks down both approaches feature by feature.

Everhour Pros & Cons

Pros	Cons
Deep integrations with popular PM tools	Much less distinctive as a standalone system
Budget alerts and billing controls	Five-seat minimum on Team
Resource planning included	Workflow depends on supported integrations
Free plan for up to five users	No passive background activity capture

 

Best for: consulting teams that already manage client delivery in a supported project management tool.

Not ideal if: you want a separate system to handle more of the consulting operation outside your PM platform.

Read the full TimeCamp vs Everhour comparison →

Timely: best for AI-drafted timesheets in client-billing consultancies

Why Timely works for consultants

Timely’s Memory AI automatically captures work across apps, websites, files, meetings, and calendar events, building a private activity timeline visible only to the user. AutoSheet uses that context to draft time entries and suggest project assignments.

Users review and edit those drafts before logging them. The software does the capture and first pass, but the consultant keeps control over what reaches the final timesheet.

Read our full Timely overview →

Key features for consultants

• Memory AI. Automatically captures work across apps, websites, files, meetings, and calendar events on a private timeline.
• AutoSheet. AI turns captured activity into draft timesheets that can be edited before approval.
• Project financials. Timely supports billable rates, budgets, and internal cost rates.
• Planning and integrations. Premium adds team planning plus project management and accounting integrations. Unlimited adds deeper capacity reporting.

Pricing

Starter costs $9 per user/month billed yearly for up to five users and 20 projects. Premium costs $16 with unlimited projects and up to 50 users. Unlimited costs $22 and removes the user limit.

Automatic tracking and AI timesheets are included across all three plans. Premium adds budgets, planning, and integrations; Unlimited expands capacity management and reporting. A free trial is available.

What customers are saying

Independent ratings: G2 4.8/5, Capterra 4.7/5.

Our team loves the auto timesheet as well.	It does not pick up my time in small timeframes.
Hannah M., Managing Director, Capterra, July 25, 2026. She also highlighted AI tracking as a practical way to piece together the workday.	David G., President, Capterra, April 8, 2026. That makes review especially important on fragmented consulting days. Timely can do much of the drafting, but short pieces of work still deserve a quick check before billing.

Why is Timely on this list for consultants?

Timely takes much of the manual reconstruction out of fragmented consulting days while keeping raw Memory activity private to each user.

If you want to see exactly how Memory and AutoSheet differ from TimeCamp’s automatic tracking, our TimeCamp vs Timely article takes both approaches apart in more detail.

Timely Pros & Cons

Pros	Cons
Automatic activity capture across desktop work	Draft entries still need review
AI-generated timesheets	Short activities can be missed
Raw Memory data stays private to the user	Starter is capped at five users and 20 projects
Capacity planning on higher plans	Planning and accounting integrations require Premium or Unlimited

 

Best for: consultants and client-billing teams that want AI-drafted timesheets built from captured work activity.

Not ideal if: every short activity must reach the timesheet automatically with no correction.

Read the full TimeCamp vs Timely comparison →

Why do consultants need dedicated time tracking in 2026?

Consulting work is fragmented by nature. A client call can lead straight into follow-up research, a document review, or a few quick changes for another account, all before the next scheduled meeting starts. When those switches aren’t captured as they happen, short pieces of billable work can disappear from the time record and never reach the invoice.

Fixed-fee work needs accurate time data for a different reason. Extra hours reduce margin, and tracked time shows how quickly the budget is being used, where scope is expanding, and what the engagement actually costs. It also gives firms a better baseline for future quotes. Even when invoices don’t list hours, those records improve client billing decisions.

Retainers can hide growing workloads behind a flat monthly fee. Billable and non-billable records show when an account starts consuming more team time than the pricing assumed, giving firms better data before renewal.

At firm level, time data feeds utilization and staffing decisions. SPI Research’s 2026 Professional Services Maturity Benchmark covered more than 500 organizations representing over 245,000 employees. 

Average billable utilization was 66.4% in 2025, compared with the 75% level SPI considers optimal. Level 5 organizations exceeded 80%.

 

These aren’t universal targets, but they show why tracked time data also matters for capacity and project profitability.

How much billable time do consultancies lose in 2026?

Let’s check the numbers. Rocketlane puts the loss from poor time tracking at 15–25% of billable hours. Miru and TriAxis repeat the same range.

Note: I couldn’t find a primary study behind that number, so I’d treat it as a vendor estimate, not a market benchmark.

 

Rocketlane also claims that teams abandon tools requiring more than 15 minutes for time entry within 90 days, that memory-based entry creates an 8–12% billing accuracy gap, and that automated invoicing can cut billing errors by up to 43%. Those figures come from the vendor’s own 2026 guide, not independent research.

The $7.4 billion per day estimate is easier to trace. Harvard Business Review reported it in 2015 from an AffinityLive study on unrecorded work across U.S. professional services. I’d use it as historical context, not as a current benchmark for the consulting market eleven years later.

SPI Research offers a more current reference point. Its 2026 benchmark puts revenue leakage across professional services at about 4.5% in 2025, including missed billing, scope creep, write-offs, and contract-control issues. For firms trying to track billable hours and improve accurate billing, that gives us a firmer current benchmark.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best free time tracking software for consultants?

TimeCamp has the broadest free option in this list. Free includes unlimited users and projects plus manual and automatic time tracking.

That covers teams focused mainly on recording work. Billing rates, budgets, profitability controls, and approvals sit on paid plans, and several PSA platforms in this comparison offer only a trial.

Which tools integrate with QuickBooks Online and Xero?

TimeCamp, Scoro, Productive, Kantata, BigTime, Ruddr, Avaza, and Everhour support both QuickBooks Online and Xero in some form.

The connection itself varies. Invoice export, two-way accounting sync, and external connectors create different workflows. QuickBooks Online also shouldn’t be confused with QuickBooks Desktop. BigTime and Kantata support Desktop as well, whereas Scoro’s QuickBooks integration is Online only.

Timely supports QuickBooks Online for invoicing. Its Xero accounting integration isn’t currently available.

Which tools integrate with the PM tools consultants use, such as Asana, Jira, and ClickUp?

Everhour is the clearest PM-centric option because it puts time controls directly inside supported project management tools.

TimeCamp supports Asana, Jira, and ClickUp as well. Timely lists integrations with all three, and Productive connects directly with Jira, with additional workflows available through Zapier and its API.

Hourly vs fixed-fee vs retainer: does the billing model change which tool you need?

Yes. Hourly consulting depends heavily on accurate time capture, billing rates, and invoicing.

Fixed-fee projects put more pressure on budget and margin tracking because every extra hour changes profitability. Retainers need visibility into how much team capacity each client consumes during the billing period.

How do utilization and realization rates help a consultancy?

Billable utilization shows how much available consultant time goes to client work. Realization measures how much of the value delivered actually turns into billed revenue.

Professional services firms commonly work with 70–85% utilization targets, although the useful level varies by role and business model. Real-time utilization dashboards help managers track progress toward those targets during the reporting period, when staffing or workload can still be adjusted.

The second metric exposes different issues, including write-offs, scope creep, pricing problems, and work that never reaches the invoice. Exact formulas vary between firms, so comparisons only work when the underlying definition stays consistent.

Do consultants need resource planning, or is time tracking enough?

Small teams can run perfectly well on time tracking alone. Resource planning solves a different problem: it shows who already has work booked and where there is room for another client or project.

Once several engagements compete for the same people, historical time records tell only part of the story. Managers also need a forward view of workload and availability.

Is employee monitoring necessary for consultancies?

No. Accurate time tracking doesn’t require screenshots or constant employee monitoring.

TimeCamp screenshots are optional, off by default, and controlled by the account administrator. Consulting teams can track projects, billable time, budgets, rates, invoices, and approvals without enabling them.

Which time tracking tool should your consultancy choose?

Start with the problem sitting behind the timesheet. TimeCamp: automatic capture with billing and profitability. Scoro, Productive, or Kantata: broader PSA and resource planning. BigTime: complex rates and approval workflows. Ruddr: modern PSA with transparent pricing. TimeLog: European project-finance workflows. Avaza: compact project-to-invoice setup for smaller firms. Everhour: time tracking inside existing PM tools. Timely: AI-drafted timesheets from captured activity.

 

Consulting firms don’t lose much by choosing a tool with fewer features. The real cost shows up when recorded time never makes it beyond the timesheet, leaving client billing incomplete and making it harder to see whether an engagement is still paying off.

If TimeCamp is on your shortlist, our detailed guide to time tracking for consultants takes a closer look at how captured work moves into billing and helps flag projects that are quietly becoming less profitable.

Whether in-office or at client's

And from independent consultants to large professional services firms, TimeCamp makes sure every billable work hour lands into timesheets.

Start free

---

Sources:

https://hbr.org/2015/01/workers-are-bad-at-filling-out-timesheets-and-it-costs-billions-a-day

https://www.timecamp.com/pricing/

https://www.g2.com/products/timecamp/reviews

https://www.capterra.com/p/142042/Scoro/reviews/

https://productive.io/pricing/

https://www.capterra.com/p/169710/Productive/reviews/

https://www.kantata.com/pricing

https://www.capterra.com/p/110832/kantata/reviews/

https://www.capterra.com/p/131076/BigTime/reviews/

https://www.ruddr.com/pricing

https://www.g2.com/products/ruddr-professional-services-automation/reviews

https://timelog.com/en/pricing

https://www.g2.com/products/timelog/reviews

https://www.g2.com/products/avaza/reviews

https://everhour.com/pricing

https://www.g2.com/products/everhour/reviews

https://www.timely.com/pricing/

https://www.capterra.com/p/131584/Timely/reviews/

Check out our other posts

• 10 Best Time Tracking Software for Consultants in 2026 [Tested]
• Toggl Reviews 2026: What Real Users Actually Say
• 10 Best Time tracking Software for Construction 2026
• Clockify Reviews 2026: What Real Users Actually Say
• Best time tracking apps for accountants and CPA firms in 2026
• Harvest Pricing 2026 explained (+ flat-rate alternative & migration)
• The 11 ActivTrak Alternatives in 2026 (Privacy-Friendly and Monitoring)
• TimeCamp vs My Hours: which time tracker wins for billable teams in 2026?
• The 10 Best My Hours Alternatives in 2026 (Free, Paid, and Open-Source)
• What Is My Hours? 2026 Features, Pricing & Limits
• 12 RescueTime Alternatives, Ranked by What RescueTime Still Can’t Do (2026)
• What Is RescueTime? 2026 Features, Pricing & Limits
• TimeCamp vs Timely (2026): Which AI Time Tracker Wins?
• TimeCamp vs DeskTime 2026: Screen Activity or Project Profitability?
• TimeCamp vs QuickBooks Time (2026): Payroll Integration or Project Profitability?
• Why Agencies Lose Billable Hours in 2026 (and the One Change That Gets Them Back)
• TimeCamp vs Jibble 2026: Face Recognition or Project Profitability?
• TimeCamp vs Everhour (2026): Project Time vs Business Time Data
• TimeCamp vs Time Doctor 2026: AI-Powered Tracking vs Productivity Monitoring
• TimeCamp vs Harvest: Pricing, Features, Billing & Profitability Compared (2026 Update)

Markdown

Wojciech Piwowarski Wojciech Piwowarski is an author covering time tracking, business operations, and productivity. He specializes in turning complex topics such as workflow efficiency, profitability, and performance measurement into clear, practical insights. His experience comes from years of working with SaaS, B2B, and operational content built for decision-makers and professional teams. His work focuses on the role time data plays in better processes, sharper decisions, and stronger business performance.

Your review

Your overall rating Select a Rating5 Stars4 Stars3 Stars2 Stars1 Star

Submit Review